Fighting back, by Ed Miller

Hyper-aggressive players are proliferating at the tables. Here is an interesting article to try to exploit your strategy. If you've played a lot of No Limit, no doubt you've ever faced against a hyper-aggressive player. This player bets and rises steadily without actually having strong hands every time he does. In many games, hyper-aggressive player wins because nobody has the nose to fight back. He takes pot after pot while rivals expect a strong hand. It's fine if someone steals pot after pot to others at the table, while it is not you! You have to fight back. This article will show you how. First I will discuss two common mistakes that people make when trying to fight back and then I'll give you two tips for a successful defense. Do not try to bind a flop Many players react to a hyper-aggressive player and a thief trying to link a flop. Pagan pre-flop with the intention to withdraw if they fail, but putting money in the pot if they tie tightly. Perhaps this is the worst way to fight back. Plan is to contribute to hyper-aggressive play. Here's an example. It's a game of $ 2 / $ 5 with stacks of $ 500.

NotGonnaTakelt rises to $ 20 with Ad Th three of the button. SirRaiseALot rises to $ 70 in the cut-off. All others are removed. NotGonnaTakelt is tired of being reraised and pay. The flop comes Qd 9h 7h. NotGonnaTekelt happens. SirRaiseALot bet $ 90. NotGonnaTakelt frustrated glances as it has missed the flop happens. The problem of trying to link a flop is simple. It is much easier to link it missing the flop. If you give up all the boats in which you miss, you'll almost always retirándote. You may think you can solve that by winning a big pot while pickups, but that does not happen most of the time. SirRaiseALot is aggressive, not stupid. You dodge and not going to pay. Pay at first hand tying waiting does not work. If you're not really prepared to fight, do not get. Do not play with the fear of losing your stack The hyper-aggressiveness works best with players who are afraid of losing your entire stack. Nobody likes to lose his stack, but some players are terrified. Losing $ 50 or $ 100 in one hand is not a big problem. But losing $ 500 at once is unthinkable.

The point is this. When you do not mind losing $ 50 or $ 100 but are completely unwilling to risk $ 500 are a prey to the hyper-aggressive player. The trick will be to him then "threaten your stack and I get the boat?. If you go back every time your stack is at risk will be giving away large sums of money. Simply use your readings with your stack. When you do, sometimes you lose. Repurchase and on. This is how poker is played hard. Beware Countering the last bet against a player either hyper-aggressive means to play pots with some of the weaker hands against a player that would play normal. This is not necessarily true because if you're not willing to do more loose your ranks to play a big pot, hyper-aggressive player will force you to play for stacks repeatedly and steal pot after pot. The trick to playing marginal hands profitably in large pots is to hold the last bet. When two players have weak hands, which usually throws the last bet wins. The "last bet? need not be an all-in but all-in bet is the simplest example of this concept. We are in a game of $ 2 / $ 5 to $ 500 stack.

NotGonnaTakelt up to $ 20 from the cut-off with Ad Kc. SirRaiseALot up to $ 70 from the big blind. NotGonnaTakelt pay. The flop comes Jd Tc 3d. SirRaiseALot bet $ 100. NotGonnaTakelt goes all-in. The key is to call the reraise pre-flop. The plan is, as SirRaiseALot bet is to go all in on the flop. By pre-flop call and go all in on any flop, NotGonnaTakelt save the last bet for himself, forcing SirRaiseALot consequently to continue with his hand or give up. Obviously you can use any time the last bet going all-in. But I do not want to bet all in for $ 400 in a pot of $ 50. That puts too much at risk for inadequate reward. Instead, you want your all-in is approximately proportional to the size of the pot. Plan ahead so hand your opponent hyper-aggressive build the boat to steal you a decisive bet. Give string Normally when a strong hand leagues to fight back and risk a good portion of your stack, you have the initiative of the bets. This attitude of common sense works better because the players most likely will pay more betting medium strength hands than they would bet themselves.

Against hyper-aggressive players, however, the opposite is often true. Big bets pay only when they have a strong hand. But constantly bet if they believe the boat is available to them. So what to do? Build the boat soon and then let him act. If you sell it, your opponent will bet and you can pay or raise. Here's an example. It is a game of $ 2 / $ 5 to $ 500 stack. SirRaiseALot opens to $ 25 for four of the button. A weak player pays the button and you pay the big blind with 6h 6c. The flop is Qh 6d Th giving a trio. Bet $ 70, SirRaiseALot pay and the button folds. The turn is the Tc. Passes and the passes. The river was the 3c. Happens again. Your opponent could have paid the flop with a flush or straight and may have failed. Probably will be removed if you bet. On the other hand, from the perspective of your rival, you could also have a failed project. If you bet, could steal a boat that has no chance of winning the showdown. Makes check-raise all-in. Make the check can win an extra bet of a failed project. And you can get lucky and win the stack if you decide to play a hand like AQ in a strange way.

Against a typical player would probably want to keep betting on the turn, waiting to pay you with projects that are not dead. But against a hyper-aggressive you have to give him some rope. Play in your terms When you keep the latest venture for you and confuse your opponent "giving up? with strong hands, the player you are facing hyper-aggressive in your terms. If you do this constantly and not get frustrated you get the best part eventually. Source: Noted Poker Authority.

...